Due to changes in state laws there is a new 10% per year assessment increase cap in place for the assessed values for the City, County, and Region portions of your tax bills.  However this cap does not apply to the School Board portion of the bill.

Unfortunately the capping system only affects the value of the property and not the total taxes owed, similar to the way the “Save Our Homes” amendment capped the increase of Homesteaded properties at 3% per year or the CPI, whichever is less.

Thus you may notice that despite the value of your property decreasing or staying the same the taxes you are required to pay has gone up or stayed the same.  See our post If Real Estate Values Have Gone Down, Why Did My Taxes Go Up? for more in depth explanation.

In order to continue to provide the level of service you deserve, we have had to slightly alter our fee structure, because it is now possible to achieve a tax savings on the uncapped School Board Portion of the tax bill, while not achieving a savings on the other portions.  Because of this we are charging 5% more than before on the School Board portion with represents 1/3 of the tax bill and 5% less on the remaining 2/3 of the tax bill.

Please read your appeal agreement to see the exact changes.

In this first example Market Value has risen beyond the 10% capped value, and thus our reduction resulted in a large savings for the School Board portion and a small savings in the other portions.  Our fee in this example represents 38% of the achieved savings, but is of smaller amount than the other examples.

In this example both Market and Assessed Values are the same resulting in a large savings in both the School Board and Other portions of the tax bill.  Our fee in this example represents 33% of the achieved savings.

In this example both Market and Assessed Values are the same resulting in a large savings in both the School Board and Other portions of the tax bill.  Our fee in this example represents 35% of the achieved savings.  This was our old fee structure which is no longer used.

As you can see from the examples,  in cases where Market and Assessed Values are equal then you will be paying approximately 33% of the achieved savings, less than before.  In cases where Market Value exceeds Assessed Value you will paying 38% of the savings but the fee amount will typically be lower.

In Florida this is the time of year when property owners are notified of the amount of the real estate taxes to expect on the tax bill which will be sent the first of November.  This notice know as a TRIM or “Truth in Millage” notice.   In some cases, for the year of 2010 it is showing an increase in the real estate taxes, even though values have declined.

This increase is because of one of two possibilities.  Although the Market Value may have declined the “Assessed Value” (the amount used to calculate your taxes) increased because of the provisions Florida’s “Save or Homes” or Homestead Exemption legislation.  Homestead Exemption provides that the assessment for residential properties, with Homestead Exemption, cannot increase by more than 3% or the Cost of Living, whichever is less.  For the year of 2010 the Cost of Living increase is calculated at 2.7%.  Therefore, for residential “Homestead Exempt” properties the assessment increased by 2.7%, This can happen up until the Assessed Values and Market Values meet.  But under no circumstances can your Assessed Value exceed your Market Value.

The other possibility is that the Millage Rate increased more than the property’s value decreased.  Real estate taxes are calculated by multiplying the “Assessed Value” by the “Millage Rate”. The “Millage Rate” is based on the amount of money local government needs from real estate assessments divided by the total “Assessed Values.”  For example, if government needs $1,000,000 to operate and the total “Assessed Value” is $50,000,000 the millage rate is 20 mills or more simply 2.0% of “Assessed Value”.  If government needs $1,000,000 and the total “Assessed Value” declines to $45,000,000 then the Millage rate will increase to 22 mills or 2.2%.  Therefore, when “Assessed Values” decline and government needs remain the same the Millage rate will increase.  For properties in the City of Miami, the Millage rate from 2009 to 2010 increased by 14.27%.

For example, if your property is in the City of Miami, unless the “Assessed Value” decreased from 2009 to 2010 by more than 14.27% your real estate taxes will be the same or higher.  This increase in taxes is a result of the millage rate increase because of the decline in “Total Assessed Values” without a equal decline in the Governments budget for the year.

Although the “Millage Rate” for all classes and types of properties in a government area are the same, the limitation on the increase in assessments under “Homestead Exemption” does not apply to non-homestead properties, for those properties there is now a 10% increase cap for the portions of your tax bill that are paid to the City/County/Region, but the cap does not apply to the School Board portion of which for the Assessed Value always equals Market Value, and is taxed on that amount.

In reviewing the assessment for commercial properties of our tax appeal clients, we have found moderate increases in the assessments but with the increase in the millage rates the real estate taxes have increased.  For example, if your property is in the County and the “Assessed Value” remained the same, the increase in the “Millage Rate” of 8.6% means your real estate taxes are 8.6% greater.

What can you do to make sure you are only paying your fair share of real estate taxes?  If you believe your assessment is too high you can file an appeal petition or have us appeal on your behalf.  If you believe the millage rate is too high you should attend the City and County Budget Hearing Meeting to express your feelings and demand a reduction in government spending.  One solution I have suggested is that every government expenditure, every payment and every expense should be easily available for public review online.  Our government needs to be held accountable for how they spend our tax dollars.

By Tom Dixon

by Tom Dixon

Hopefully, now that we have passed through the dark time of not knowing what the financial future holds for us, it is time to consider how things can be better in the future. It seems to me that not too many years ago the belief was that if you have more, spend more and live in a bigger house you will be happier. Maybe it is now time to re-think what all this “more” has created.

My guess is that this came about because we were not content with what we had and thought more would be better. In terms of houses, this was financially possible but had a hidden trap. If you could buy a home for $100,000 with a down payment of $10,000 and a loan of $90,000 and the price of the home increased by only 10% then it would have a value of $110,000. With a $90,000 mortgage you had made $20,000, a 100% return on your $10,000 investment. If you can keep refinancing your home loan at 90% of its value will continue to double your money. Why not? The why not or risk is that if the value of your home declines then your equity is wiped out. Yes it was fun while it lasted but eventually more homes and condos were built than there were people able to afford to purchase without fraud or even to live in them. Prices declined and equity was wiped out.

The second problem became the cost for mortgage payments, upkeep, insurance, and real estate taxes. As long as values were going up it made sense. But when home prices stopped rising couples with no children began to question their need for 8,000 SF 6 bedroom 6 bath home with real estate tax bills of $4,000 to $6,000 per month. An excessive home is like a Hummer, yes to looks cool and seemed like a good idea, but do we really need to live in a monster home and drive around in such a massive vehicle.

How did all this happen? The combination of a belief that good times will continue, incomes will rise, home prices will never decline and more and more and bigger and bigger are better. This is not to say that there may be reasons for big homes and big cars, but just because we can borrow money to buy them is not a good reason.

So how do we overcome the “Hummer Dilemma”? A realization that perhaps the answer is in these quotes :

“Too many people spend money they haven’t earned, to buy things they don’t want, to impress people they don’t like.” -Will Smith

“Wealth consists not in having great possessions but in having few wants.” -Epicurus

Or this great truism my wife Linda gave us when we moved to our new office. “The best things in life are not things”.

On Thursday June 17,th we presented the 2010 South Florida Office Market Report.  If you missed the presentation or want a copy of the printed report you can find it and all the previous report under the CIASF tab of our website.

We just added a PDF version of the CIASF’s 2010 Hospitality Report compiled by Guy Trusty to our CIASF page.  Check it out.